BGonline.org Forums

PvP take action

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 21 February 2016, at 10:27 p.m.

In Response To: PvP take action (Karol Szczerek)

I just passed a position like this recently and the bot soundly berated me for it. Well, in my position Blue had slightly better timing and White's six-prime was shifted backwards a pip, but I think Blue's board and prime was actually weaker.

I think Blue has enough to take here. White does have to move first, and could crack before escaping a back checker. That seems to be the main consideration. There are also some auxiliary variations that give Blue a chance. White might run one checker and the other checker might get counterprimed.

Messages In This Thread

• PvP take action
  Karol Szczerek -- Sunday, 21 February 2016, at 9:35 p.m.
  • PvP take action
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 21 February 2016, at 10:27 p.m.
    • PvP take action
      Florin Popa -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 11:28 a.m.
  • PvP take action
    Keene -- Sunday, 21 February 2016, at 11:37 p.m.
  • PvP take action
    Dan Wittkopp -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 11:41 a.m.
  • PvP take action
    Casper Van der Tak -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 2:30 p.m.
  • PvP take action - OTB, RO, Variant
    Karol Szczerek -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 10:13 p.m.
    • PvP take action - OTB, RO, Variant
      Casper Van der Tak -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 10:47 p.m.
    • PvP take action - OTB, RO, Variant
      Keene -- Monday, 22 February 2016, at 11:01 p.m.