BGonline.org Forums
Ruling in Chicago
Posted By: Sam Pottle
Date: Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 8:55 a.m.
In Response To: Ruling in Chicago (Michael Crane)
My suggestion: not "the opponent's dice"; rather "the dice". You might also want to put the rest of the procedure (stop the clocks, etc.) into this rule instead of having it spread across more than one rule.
Messages In This Thread
- Ruling in Chicago
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 June 2010, at 11:59 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 12:26 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:23 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:46 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:26 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:05 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:22 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:41 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 8:20 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Michael Crane -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 8:50 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 8:55 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 2:39 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:28 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 12:55 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:37 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
phil simborg -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 4:24 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Jason Lee -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:38 a.m.
- there is no ruling
garyo -- Friday, 4 June 2010, at 6:33 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.