BGonline.org Forums
Ruling in Chicago
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:14 p.m.
In Response To: Ruling in Chicago (Jason Lee)
My interpretation of the rule has always been the one that Sam gives, although it has never come up as far as I can recall.
Messages In This Thread
- Ruling in Chicago
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 2 June 2010, at 11:59 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 12:26 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:23 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:46 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:26 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:05 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:22 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:28 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 12:55 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Jason Lee -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:14 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 4:11 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Jason Lee -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:11 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:14 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 6:10 p.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 4 June 2010, at 12:14 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 1:37 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
phil simborg -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 4:24 a.m.
- Ruling in Chicago
Jason Lee -- Thursday, 3 June 2010, at 5:38 a.m.
- there is no ruling
garyo -- Friday, 4 June 2010, at 6:33 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.