GIANTS'2012 REVIEW(very long)
Posted By: Michael Petch In Response To: GIANTS'2012 REVIEW(very long) (Bill Riles)
Date: Monday, 23 January 2012, at 5:33 p.m.
In Response To: GIANTS'2012 REVIEW(very long) (Bill Riles)
Funny Bill did you complain when Stick did it last year and also campaigned for himself?
The Giants list is completely subjective, non scientific, has very few rules, and at the end of the day rather meaningless list that is only interesting to a very small minority of people on the planet.
Many people might not be as well known world wide because they are localized players, which is the case with some of Iancho's players in his post. Iancho also brings up well known players. He seems to have a reasonable cross section, and doesn't promote himself. Whether his opinion is biased or not I see absolutely nothing immoral or unethical with what he did. He didn't promote himself on his list, and even if he did so what. Campaigning by special interest groups with deep pockets is very popular with many types of races these days.
Talking about integrity, I can think of a campaign going on right now where it is all dirty tricks. Powerful lobby and special interest groups running attack ads, smear campaign, daily gossip to destroy other candidates and this is how the free world operates. And this is becoming/is the norm. Makes the Giants list vote and Iancho's post look pretty moral and clean.
Messages In This Thread
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.