BGonline.org Forums

52S-52K-31-54@-42

Posted By: Stick
Date: Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 3:27 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-52K-31-54@-42 (Dmitriy Obukhov)

Any better nactation sequence?

Are you asking if your Nactation is correct or if there's a better sequence (with less errors, aka minus 52K) to reach this position?

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• 52S-52K-31-54@-42
  Dmitriy Obukhov -- Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 5:13 a.m.
  • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
    Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 5:32 a.m.
  • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
    Stick -- Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 3:27 p.m.
    • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
      Dmitriy Obukhov -- Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 8:12 p.m.
      • 54S-32H-65K-51-63H-54@-21V-65R-42
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 5 September 2011, at 5:35 p.m.
  • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 4 September 2011, at 6:49 p.m.
    • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 5 September 2011, at 6:06 p.m.
      • 52S-xxx-42 — Clarification Needed
        Taper_Mike -- Friday, 30 May 2014, at 11:57 a.m.
        • 52S-xxx-42 — Clarification Needed
          Nack Ballard -- Friday, 30 May 2014, at 8:57 p.m.
  • 52S-52K-31-54@-42
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 30 May 2014, at 4:04 p.m.