[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

52S-xxx-42 — Clarification Needed

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Friday, 30 May 2014, at 11:57 a.m.

In Response To: 52S-52K-31-54@-42 (Nack Ballard)

Nack published a list of Snowie truncs for 52S-xxx-42 in two different posts at BGO. The data in the two posts match, except for the four sequences in the table below. Nack may be able to identify which data are more accurate. Until then, the notes below provide my best guesses. You can click the column headings to see Nack’s original posts.

Sequence BGO Msg. No.
69383 		BGO Msg. No.
105014 		Note
52S-61P-42 [@ P64] tr .061 My guess is that Nack copied the roll (61) in the second of these. I am using P64.
52S-63R-42 [@ P21] tr
[@ P6] 5k no live cube
[@ P13] aggregate 		.014 The second of these (.014) is probably an aggregate. My guess is that Nack rounded the first aggregate down, even though the value was between 13.5 and 13.9. I am not using either aggregate.
52S-64P-42 [P @16] tr –.017 My guess is that Nack rounded the first value down, even though the it was between 16.5 and 16.9. I am using the second value, 17.
52S-65R-42 [@ P24] tr .028 Uh oh! I have no theory about this pair. Neither one is particularly close to the XGR++ eval: n[@ P14.8]. I am using P24.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.