BGonline.org Forums

Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand

Posted By: Tenland
Date: Tuesday, 5 February 2013, at 7:52 p.m.

Why does 8/7(2) 6/5(2) go up in value (according to xg++) compared to 24/22 6/5(2) when the opening was 64 (making the deuce) compared to if it were 53?

I mean, I can come up with reasons 24/22 should gain ground instead: *worse prospects for priming after making the deuce instead of trey, and worse prime timing because of the race *less of a priority to trap opponents back checkers and more of a priority to escape my own as I'm up by more in the race

And yes, it's a very slight effect, but it goes in the opposite direction of what I would expect...

Messages In This Thread

• Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
  Tenland -- Tuesday, 5 February 2013, at 7:52 p.m.
  • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
    Stick -- Tuesday, 5 February 2013, at 11:55 p.m.
    • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
      Smcrtorchs -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 1:28 a.m.
      • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
        Tenland -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 7:15 p.m.
    • 64P-31P-11 — Index to Rollouts
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 10:14 a.m.
    • 53P-31P-11 — Index to Rollouts
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 10:15 a.m.
  • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 1:07 a.m.
    • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
      Tenland -- Wednesday, 6 February 2013, at 7:58 p.m.
      • Third roll 11 after 53-31 and after 64P-31, I don't understand
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 8 February 2013, at 12:20 a.m.