BGonline.org Forums

2nd roll that may be affected due to Jacoby

Posted By: David Presser
Date: Thursday, 26 September 2013, at 4:57 p.m.

In Response To: Hiding behind Jacoby (Daniel Murphy)

The sequence that immediately came to my mind is 61p-43

2 up is marginally better than splitting. However, is it possible that its because the joker pointing numbers on both checkers followed by a dance results in a D/P instead of TG because of Jacoby?

Messages In This Thread

• 501 Essential Backgammon Problems #102
  Igor -- Thursday, 19 September 2013, at 2:03 a.m.
  • 501 Essential Backgammon Problems #102
    ah_clem -- Thursday, 19 September 2013, at 2:33 a.m.
  • 501 Essential Backgammon Problems #102
    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 19 September 2013, at 11:21 a.m.
  • 501 Essential Backgammon Problems #102 -- Rollout + Variants
    Igor -- Saturday, 21 September 2013, at 4:33 p.m.
    • 501 Essential Backgammon Problems #102 -- Rollout + Variants
      Philippe Michel -- Saturday, 21 September 2013, at 7:20 p.m.
    • Hiding behind Jacoby
      Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 24 September 2013, at 11:08 p.m.
      • Hiding behind Jacoby
        Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 25 September 2013, at 12:44 a.m.
        • 2nd roll that may be affected due to Jacoby
          David Presser -- Thursday, 26 September 2013, at 4:57 p.m.
      • Hiding behind Jacoby
        Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 25 September 2013, at 2:16 p.m.
      • Hiding behind Jacoby
        Igor -- Wednesday, 25 September 2013, at 10:14 p.m.
      • Hiding behind Jacoby
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 26 September 2013, at 10:24 a.m.