|
BGonline.org Forums
21$-62 Index to Rollouts
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: 21$-62 4 ply RO result (neilkaz)
Date: Friday, 27 September 2013, at 12:40 a.m.
XGID=-b----E-C---dEa--c-da---B-:0:0:1:62:0:0:3:0:10
21$-62 — Unlimited Games Bot Seed Equity Nacbracs Link [Bot Aggregate] [Not posted] [Not posted] [S Z6 N11] a [Aggregate] GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply [Stick 46k + Stick 46k + Stick 5k] 289.1 [Z N1 S2 $19 D27 R32] /46**5 BgOnline.org GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply [Stick 46k + Stick 46k + Stick 5k] 289.1 [Z S2 N3 $19 D27 R32] /46*93 5 [GnuBg Aggregate] GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 1073706349 307.7 [$] /5 Stick GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 982761661 290.5 [N D26 R31] /46 5 Stick GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 983289024 289.1 [Z S2 N5] /46 Stick Jellyfish [Not posted] [Not posted] [S Z11 $11 D14 R14 N16 U30] Jellyfish, 7200 trials [Unknown] Snowie 4.x.x 3-ply [Not posted] [Not posted] [S Z10 N19 $22 D22 R13 U31 W72] ~56*****20 5 [Snowie Aggregate] Snowie 4.x.x 3-ply, Cubeful (not Live Cube) [Not posted] [Not posted] [Z S5 N7] ~41 Cubeful; not Live Cube [Snowie Aggregate] Snowie 4.x.x 3-ply Trunc [Not posted] [Not posted] [Z S3 N7] ~t Nack Ballard Snowie 4.x.x 3-ply [Random seed] 295 [Z=S N14] ~5 BgOnline.org XG 1.xx 3-ply [Not posted] [Not posted] [S N10 Z11] '<15 Nack Ballard XG 1.xx 3-ply [Not posted] [Not posted] [S Z10 N12 $21 D26 R28 U43] '<62**31 Nack Ballard XG 1.xx 3-ply, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross 1 297.5 [S Z5] '<5 Dmitriy Obukhov XG 1.12 4-ply 1 292 [S Z9 N15 D20 R36] '^19*7 5 2 Neil Kazaross XG 2.xx 3-ply 22080951 289.0 [S Z9 N15 D22 $26 R31 U44] "<62**31*15 10 David Rockwell XG 2.00 3-ply 6828926 280.3 [S N20 Z23 D30 R39 $45 U46] "<5 10 5 Chris Yep XG 2.10.192.pre-release 3-ply 78623594 290.9 [S N7 Z9 D18 R28] "^32*15 5 Neil Kazaross
21$-62 — Double Match Point Bot Seed Equity Nacbracs Link GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 824068618 114.554 d[S N9 Z10] /10 Stick XG 1.xx 3-ply [Not posted] [Not posted] d[S N7 Z11 D17 U18 R18 $20] '<31*25 15**10 David Rockwell XG 2.03 3-ply, MET: Kazaross XG2 7557664 114.5 d[S N7 R16 D16 Z17 $18 U21] "<15*2 Miran Tuhtan XG 2.01 3-ply, Cubes: XGR 741976 114.9 d[S N7 Z14 R18 U23] "<=10 Tommy Nesbakk
21$-62 — Gammon Go Bot Seed Equity Nacbracs Link GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 810512563 +127.323 g[D N1 Z6 $13 S14] /5 Stick XG 1.xx 3-ply 1 +121.8 g[N S10 D12 Z13 $14] '<8 Kye Hedlund XG 2.xx 3-ply 94959920 +127.7 g[N D10 Z16 S17 $18 R54] "<31*20**5 David Rockwell XG 2.01 3-ply, Cubes: XGR 741976 +128.1 g[N D10 Z18 S18 $20] "<=17 Tommy Nesbakk
21$-62 — Gammon Save Bot Seed Equity Nacbracs Link GnuBg 0.xx 2-ply 813904730 498.081 s[Z S13] /10 David Rockwell XG 2.xx 3-ply 17572190 500.1 s[N Z2 $10 S13 D15 R23 U36] "<31****15 10 David Rockwell XG 2.01 3-ply, Cubes: XGR 741976 500.4 s[N Z2 $10 S13 D15 R22] "<=46*9 Tommy Nesbakk Key: $ = Slot [13/5], D = Down [13/9 13/7], N = Near [13/7 6/4], R = Run [24/14], S = Split [24/18 13/11],
U = Up [24/22 24/18], W = Wild [24/18 6/4], Z = Reverse split [24/22 13/7]N Does Better in 4-ply Rollout
In comparing Neils 4-ply rollout in UG with the two other XG2 rollouts, a question comes to mind.In Davids 62k rollout N trails by 0.0146. In Chris Yeps 5k rollout, N trails by 0.0201. Both are margins that might cause one to reject those plays. Yet in Neils rollout, N is tied, trailing by only 0.0073.
Should we attribute the difference to the 3-ply cube decisions used in Davids and Chris rollouts, or is it primarily due to checker play differences at 3-ply?
I am inclined to think the former.
Mike
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.