|
BGonline.org Forums
To prime or not to prime - the COMPLETE ANSWER
Posted By: svilo In Response To: To prime or not to prime - Look what happens (Casper Van der Tak)
Date: Friday, 17 July 2015, at 1:45 a.m.
I meant this is not THE COMPLETE ANSWER. The simple and INCOMPLETE answer is NOT to prime. The longer answer is NOT TO PRIME BECAUSE the prime (in this particular position) cannot help much to bring more checkers in for increased gammons WHICH MATTER. It is not that 3 checkers are back, but it is that we have more ways to bring his checkers in the pen the more our free checker is brought back. The extreme situation with that checker on the ace and the match score where gammons will be irrelevant also confirm this, as Neil mentioned.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.