BGonline.org Forums
bearing off question--no David, and why?
Posted By: Phil Simborg
Date: Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 10:57 p.m.
In Response To: bearing off question--no David, and why? (garyo)
Thanks Gary...very simply and clearly stated and appreciated.
The problem is that there are times this is not correct, when you are leading and need to protect yourself when if you roll low numbers....I will work on being sure I know the difference.
Messages In This Thread
- bearing off question
Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:11 a.m.
- bearing off question
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:20 a.m.
- bearing off question
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 1:13 p.m.
- bearing off question
David Rennie -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 1:52 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 3:56 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Stick -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 3:59 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 4:06 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 7:32 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
garyo -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:35 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 10:57 p.m.
- bearing off question
David Rennie -- Thursday, 30 June 2016, at 2:56 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.