|
BGonline.org Forums
After ~13,000
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: 51S-21 4 ply XG RO so far (neilkaz)
Date: Friday, 1 January 2010, at 5:55 p.m.
As I expected, and as was also shown by someone's DMP RO, $ wins a bit more games, but the added G and BG losses seem to be making it slightly incorrect from a technical standpoint. We can also clearly see that slotting leads to a longer game (time shown) and one would expect more complications vs weaker players.
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 161Money session
Jacoby Beaverpip: 167
score: 0
is Player 1XGID=-aa---E-C---dE---d-e----B-:0:0:1:12:0:0:3:0:10 to play 12
1. Rollout1 24/21 eq: -0.164
Player:
Opponent:46.38% (G:11.20% B:0.56%)
53.62% (G:15.11% B:0.72%)Conf: ± 0.005 (-0.169...-0.159)
Duration: 18 hours 22 minutes 06 seconds2. Rollout2 13/11 6/5 eq: -0.171 (-0.007)
Player:
Opponent:46.64% (G:12.16% B:0.61%)
53.36% (G:17.12% B:1.35%)Conf: ± 0.006 (-0.177...-0.165)
Duration: 22 hours 08 minutes 33 seconds1 13057 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 4 ply
2 13055 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 4 plyeXtreme Gammon Version: 1.11
The look on my Persian opp's face was priceless when I slotted 21 in LA last month after he split. His rather early double later was also fun for me when I turned around a big 5-1 backgame (tried to get a 3rd back point, but got attacked and danced lots).
I expect that if I run a GNU RO with 2 ply Supremo playing the 21 vs 0-ply expert playing the opening 51, that slotting will be the winner. I may try that tonite.
.. neilkaz .. allready wishing he'd paid up for an even faster computer
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.