|
BGonline.org Forums
41$-63, 21$-63, 51$-63 and 62$-63
Posted By: Chase In Response To: 41$-63, 21$-63, 51$-63 and 62$-63 (Nack Ballard)
Date: Wednesday, 21 April 2010, at 10:43 a.m.
So, Neil and I are delegated to parentheses now? :)
That's always the problem with naming names -- you inevitably leave someone out or give them second billing. No slight intended to you or anyone, but, after all, I was asking about Stick's rollouts. ;)
Thanks, as always, for sharing the data. I'll report the results of my XG3 rollout of 62$-63 when it's finished, though it's looking like the top plays will be TCTC.
By the way, have you given thought to somehow indicating whether a rollout has reached statistical significance (this would require a definition, of course) in your nacbracs? This is the one thing I find lacking, as not all rollouts should be weighted equally, and the raw number of trials isn't obviously indicative (at least to me).
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.