BGonline.org Forums

51S-62S-42 and variant

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 1:21 a.m.

In Response To: 51S-62S-42 and variant (Taper_Mike)

41T-61S-42?

Surely you mean 62S-41B-52H-61H-51R-65T-62S-42. :)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
  Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 12:01 a.m.
  • 51S-62S-42 and variant
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 12:59 a.m.
    • 51S-62S-42 and variant
      Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 1:12 a.m.
      • 51S-62S-42 and variant
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 1:21 a.m.
        • 51S-62S-42 and variant
          Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 2:18 a.m.
          • 51S-62S-42 and variant
            Nack Ballard -- Monday, 16 June 2014, at 5:01 a.m.
  • Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 1:46 a.m.
    • Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
      neilkaz -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 2:44 a.m.
      • Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
        David Presser -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 4:08 a.m.
  • Running would have been better on the 2nd roll.
    Igor -- Sunday, 15 June 2014, at 3:34 p.m.
  • 51S-62S-42 and Variants – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
    Taper_Mike -- Monday, 16 June 2014, at 1:07 a.m.
    • 51S-62S-42 and Variants – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
      Igor -- Monday, 16 June 2014, at 1:58 a.m.
    • 51S-62S-42 and Variants – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollouts
      Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 16 June 2014, at 3:00 a.m.
      • Good variants from Daniel
        Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 17 June 2014, at 9:58 a.m.
        • Good variants from Daniel
          Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 18 June 2014, at 3:09 a.m.