BGonline.org Forums

Never?

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 4:52 p.m.

In Response To: Never? (David Rockwell)

I'll stand by my statement as I can't see any "proven" advantages for 43S over 43Z. Now if someone showed me 100k 4 ply RO's well....

I also think that 43Z produces more errors from the opp than 43S.

Messages In This Thread

• 43S-51H-21.–8–5 — Raj Jansari-Julien Fetterlein — 2013 London Open
  Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 5:33 a.m.
  • 43S-51H-21.–8–5 — Raj Jansari-Julien Fetterlein — 2013 London Open
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 6:28 a.m.
    • Never?
      David Rockwell -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 2:30 p.m.
      • Never?
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 4:52 p.m.
        • Never?
          Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 10:31 p.m.
      • And don't forget 43U
        David Rockwell -- Friday, 2 August 2013, at 12:49 a.m.
        • And don't forget 43U
          Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 2 August 2013, at 3:08 a.m.
      • Pattern
        David Rockwell -- Friday, 2 August 2013, at 1:12 a.m.
      • 4ply XG2 rollouts where split or Up are best
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 2 August 2013, at 3:52 a.m.
    • 43S-51H-21.–8–5 — Raj Jansari-Julien Fetterlein — 2013 London Open
      Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 1 August 2013, at 6:44 p.m.
  • Opening 43 — 8-away, 5-away — 3-ply XG2 Rollout
    Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 3 August 2013, at 11:51 p.m.
  • 43S-51H-21 — Unlimited Games — 3-ply XG2 Rollout
    Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 3 August 2013, at 11:56 p.m.