| |
BGonline.org Forums
OLM 20141123A The Prime Factors -- DECISION
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: OLM 20141123A The Prime Factors -- CONSULTATION (Jason Lee)
Date: Tuesday, 25 November 2014, at 8:56 a.m.
Look at us! We got 100% turn out on this one. Thanks once again for being the great contributors that you all are.
This a very tough play. There are several different tatical plans motivating divergent checker plays. Frankly, I found something to like in almost all the arguments. Ultimately, my vote was switched to the 21/16(2) play, but mine is only one vote. Once again, I pleased to choose the play selected by the majority of our teammates.
F (Field) = 21/16(2), 13/3
Teammate Original Move Move in Consultation Bob Koca 21/16(2), 6/1(2) There may be some immediate hitting going on which is why I like making the 1 point. My feelings about that half are much less strong than they are about importance of advancing the anchor. Casper Van der Tak 21/16(2), 13/3 In summary: 21/16(2), 13/3 as first choice, 13/3, 8/3, 6/1 as second choice. No third choice. Chuck Bower 13/3(2) My plan is to keep the 21-point and give up the 13-point, and I did both with my vote. And, yes, I'm keeping the back checker on the 24-point. Daniel Murphy 13/3, 8/3, 6/1 Fatboy 21/16(2), 13/3 21/16(2), 13/3 garyo 21/16(2), 13/3 21/16(2), 13/3 Havard Raddum 13/3, 8/3, 11/6 I'm less confident on staying on the 21 than I was, but I'm still in favor of staying. I think the good points about 13/3(2) are valid, so I'm, changing my vote to this. Igor 21/16(2), 13/3 If I'm not burying (and I'm definitely not breaking the midpoint), then 21/16(2) must be part of the move. kruidenbuiltje 13/3, 8/3, 6/1 21/16(2), 13/3 lenny 21/16(2), 6/1(2) Seth 13/3, 8/3, 6/1 Will go along with 21/16(2) play. Steve Mellen 21/16(2), 13/3 21/16(2), 13/3 Taper_Mike 13/3(2) Having heard the arguments for 21/16(2), I am beginning to be convinced.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.