BGonline.org Forums

Philsophical Question

Posted By: mamabear
Date: Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:12 p.m.

In Response To: Philsophical Question (Paul Weaver)

Would Sisyphus be better off to just sit down, have a beer, and forget about rolling the stone up the hill? Or is Camus right that merely striving for the height is enough to fill his soul? He thought Sisyphus was happy, or at least that's what he wrote, but I disagree because nothing special would happen even if he ever succeeded...

Oh wait, that discussion isn't about getting, hitting, or missing shots. It's about playing backgammon in general >>

Messages In This Thread

• Back Online
  Stick -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 2:10 a.m.
  • Philsophical Question
    Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 2:28 a.m.
    • Philsophical Question
      Alfred Mamlet -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 2:42 a.m.
      • Philsophical Question
        joe freedman -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:24 a.m.
        • Philsophical Question
          David -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:52 a.m.
          • Philsophical Question
            Stick -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:57 a.m.
        • Philsophical Question
          Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:36 p.m.
        • Philsophical Question
          Keene -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 5:38 p.m.
    • Philsophical Question
      Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 1:19 p.m.
    • Philsophical Question
      mamabear -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 4:12 p.m.
      • Philsophical Question
        joe freedman -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 8:23 p.m.
        • Philsophical Question
          mamabear -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 8:50 p.m.
          • Philsophical Question
            joe freedman -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 10:12 p.m.
            • Probably for just Joe F at this point
              mamabear -- Thursday, 19 November 2009, at 10:37 p.m.
              • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                joe freedman -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 12:20 a.m.
                • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                  Jake Jacobs -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 1:29 a.m.
                  • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 5:16 a.m.
                    • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                      Havard Raddum -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 7:32 a.m.
                      • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                        Stick -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 9:35 a.m.
                        • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                          Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 10:15 a.m.
                          • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                            Joe Russell -- Sunday, 22 November 2009, at 3:37 a.m.
                        • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                          Timothy Chow -- Friday, 20 November 2009, at 2:51 p.m.
                          • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                            joe freedman -- Saturday, 21 November 2009, at 2:19 p.m.
                            • Probably for just Joe F at this point
                              joe freedman -- Saturday, 21 November 2009, at 2:25 p.m.