BGonline.org Forums
Politely Responding to Neil
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 4:59 p.m.
In Response To: Politely Responding to Neil (Paul Weaver)
OK the 2nd choice, and one I'd not have made is 20 and 5. I'll await your RO b4 learning how wrong my boring safe play was!
Messages In This Thread
- 52D-33E-41
Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 1:46 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 4:31 p.m.
- Politely Responding to Neil
Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 4:53 p.m.
- Politely Responding to Neil
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 4:59 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41
Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 4:46 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41
storm -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 6:27 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 6:28 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41, analysis
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 9:58 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41, analysis
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 10:18 p.m.
- 52D-33 at 6a9a
Petter Bengtsson -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 10:18 p.m.
- 52D-33 at 6a9a
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 11:13 p.m.
- XGR+ evals
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 11:38 p.m.
- XGR+ evals
Petter Bengtsson -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:02 a.m.
- XGR+ evals
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:45 a.m.
- XGR+ evals
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 2:51 a.m.
- 52D-33E-41, analysis
christian munk-christensen -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 10:40 p.m.
- 52D-33E-41, analysis
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:28 a.m.
- Rollout Result and Commentary
Paul Weaver -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:46 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.