I'm still scratching my head over this one. Not sure why we want the bar point. Or maybe we just don't want to leave blots in our own outfield when White has two anchors? I haven't encountered many failed blitzes where the opponent manages to make two anchors.
1. | Rollout1 | 13/7 9/7 | eq: +0.150 |
| Player: Opponent: | 54.38% (G:34.74% B:0.50%) 45.62% (G:8.61% B:0.33%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (+0.137...+0.163) - [100.0%] Duration: 29 minutes 05 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 18/10 | eq: +0.079 (-0.071) |
| Player: Opponent: | 52.68% (G:32.43% B:0.50%) 47.32% (G:9.60% B:0.42%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (+0.066...+0.093) - [0.0%] Duration: 28 minutes 03 seconds |
|
3. | Rollout1 | 24/18 9/7 | eq: +0.079 (-0.071) |
| Player: Opponent: | 53.30% (G:31.50% B:0.41%) 46.70% (G:9.56% B:0.42%) | Conf.: ± 0.013 (+0.066...+0.093) - [0.0%] Duration: 23 minutes 30 seconds |
|
4. | Rollout1 | 24/16 | eq: +0.073 (-0.077) |
| Player: Opponent: | 53.01% (G:30.95% B:0.44%) 46.99% (G:9.41% B:0.39%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (+0.060...+0.087) - [0.0%] Duration: 29 minutes 11 seconds |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 271828 Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|