|
BGonline.org Forums
Rollout Result and Commentary
Posted By: Paul Weaver In Response To: 52D-33E-41 (Paul Weaver)
Date: Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 12:46 a.m.
Thanks to Nack for his fantastic detailed analysis. Just as Jeremy edited Walter's GammonVillage posts into a great book ("Backgammon Boot Camp"), one day someone will edit Nack's posts on this site into a supurb volume.
Nack wrote, "The above analysis is for money. I don't think that Paul's –9–6 match score is likely to make a pivotal difference for this play." Nack's statement is correct, but I am posting the XG+ eval of 52D-33E-41 for money, gammon go and -9-6 to show by how much the score affects the difference in the plays. 52D-33E-41W is "righter" at -9-6 than for money.
I am posting seven XG postions below:
(1) 52D-33E-41 rollout result for money. The posted position occurred at -9-6, but to make it more generic, I rolled it out for money.
(2) (3) (4) To show how the change in score affects White's play in 52D-33E-41, I am posting the XG+ eval of this position for Money, gammon go and -9-6.
(5) (6) (7) To show how the change in score affects Black's play in 52D-33, I am posting the XG+ eval of this position for Money, gammon save and -6-9.
33E (24/21(2) 6/3(2)) often performs surprising well on the second roll in rollouts at gammon save. In fact, it may sometimes be the best play on the second roll at gammon save. Wonder if Nack has any data supporting this assertion.
If the XG+ data presented below is close to accurate, then Kenji's play of 52D-33E was wrong by less (if wrong at all) than my play of 52D-33E-41P.
Position 1.
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 155Money session
Jacoby Beaverpip: 160
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=----b-E-D--AeC---c-c--b-B-:0:0:1:14:0:0:3:0:10 to play 14
1. Rollout1 24/20 6/5 eq: -0.318
Player:
Opponent:43.32% (G:9.57% B:0.38%)
56.68% (G:17.42% B:1.10%)Conf: ± 0.009 (-0.327...-0.309)
Duration: 3 hours 33 minutes2. Rollout2 11/7 8/7 eq: -0.340 (-0.022)
Player:
Opponent:42.67% (G:8.31% B:0.36%)
57.33% (G:16.35% B:0.63%)Conf: ± 0.008 (-0.348...-0.332)
Duration: 3 hours 04 minutes1 7843 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 3 ply
2 7842 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 3 plyeXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
Position 2.
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 155Money session
Jacoby Beaverpip: 160
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=----b-E-D--AeC---c-c--b-B-:0:0:1:41:0:0:3:0:10 to play 41
1. XG Roller+ 24/20 6/5 eq: -0.306
Player:
Opponent:43.77% (G:9.33% B:0.32%)
56.23% (G:16.79% B:1.03%)2. XG Roller+ 11/7 8/7 eq: -0.308 (-0.002)
Player:
Opponent:43.38% (G:8.69% B:0.28%)
56.62% (G:15.48% B:0.63%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
Position 3.
is Player 2
score: 3
pip: 1559 point match pip: 160
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=----b-E-D--AeC---c-c--b-B-:0:0:1:41:0:3:0:9:10 to play 41
1. XG Roller+ 24/20 6/5 eq: -0.255
Player:
Opponent:43.83% (G:9.05% B:0.31%)
56.17% (G:16.25% B:0.97%)2. XG Roller+ 11/7 8/7 eq: -0.270 (-0.015)
Player:
Opponent:43.34% (G:8.13% B:0.25%)
56.66% (G:15.49% B:0.60%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
Position 4.
is Player 2
score: 8
pip: 1559 point match
Crawfordpip: 160
score: 7
is Player 1
XGID=----b-E-D--AeC---c-c--b-B-:0:0:1:41:7:8:1:9:10 to play 41
1. XG Roller+ 24/20 6/5 eq: +0.055
Player:
Opponent:43.42% (G:9.35% B:0.29%)
56.58% (G:17.14% B:1.04%)2. XG Roller+ 11/7 8/7 eq: +0.030 (-0.026)
Player:
Opponent:43.45% (G:8.04% B:0.24%)
56.55% (G:16.44% B:0.69%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
Position 5.
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 167Money session
Jacoby Beaverpip: 160
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D--AeC---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:33:0:0:3:0:10 to play 33
1. XG Roller+ 8/5(2) 6/3(2) eq: +0.256
Player:
Opponent:56.14% (G:19.63% B:1.03%)
43.86% (G:12.40% B:0.67%)2. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 8/5(2) eq: +0.249 (-0.007)
Player:
Opponent:55.28% (G:16.18% B:0.62%)
44.72% (G:8.83% B:0.30%)3. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 13/10(2) eq: +0.244 (-0.012)
Player:
Opponent:55.76% (G:14.45% B:0.56%)
44.24% (G:8.82% B:0.29%)4. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 6/3(2) eq: +0.239 (-0.017)
Player:
Opponent:55.31% (G:14.94% B:0.62%)
44.69% (G:8.84% B:0.30%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
Position 6.
is Player 2
score: 3
pip: 1679 point match pip: 160
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D--AeC---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:33:0:3:0:9:10 to play 33
1. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 8/5(2) eq: +0.210
Player:
Opponent:55.35% (G:16.08% B:0.61%)
44.65% (G:8.68% B:0.29%)2. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 13/10(2) eq: +0.209
Player:
Opponent:55.75% (G:14.40% B:0.54%)
44.25% (G:8.51% B:0.29%)3. XG Roller+ 8/5(2) 6/3(2) eq: +0.205 (-0.005)
Player:
Opponent:56.02% (G:19.23% B:0.98%)
43.98% (G:12.19% B:0.64%)4. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 6/3(2) eq: +0.199 (-0.010)
Player:
Opponent:55.32% (G:14.56% B:0.57%)
44.68% (G:8.51% B:0.27%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
Position 7.
is Player 2
score: 8
pip: 1679 point match
Crawfordpip: 160
score: 7
is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D--AeC---c-e----B-:0:0:-1:33:7:8:1:9:10 to play 33
1. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 13/10(2) eq: -0.053
Player:
Opponent:55.51% (G:13.80% B:0.58%)
44.49% (G:8.16% B:0.25%)2. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 6/3(2) eq: -0.060 (-0.008)
Player:
Opponent:55.16% (G:14.56% B:0.66%)
44.84% (G:8.18% B:0.27%)3. XG Roller+ 24/21(2) 8/5(2) eq: -0.064 (-0.011)
Player:
Opponent:55.28% (G:16.03% B:0.71%)
44.72% (G:8.46% B:0.28%)4. XG Roller+ 8/5(2) 6/3(2) eq: -0.114 (-0.061)
Player:
Opponent:56.14% (G:19.22% B:1.10%)
43.86% (G:11.82% B:0.61%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.