BGonline.org Forums
Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 2:10 a.m.
In Response To: Hypocrisy in the backgammon community (Chuck Bower)
I am considering a hypothetical statement and not commenting on the Giants list in this question:
Suppose the Giants list did in fact have great voting irregularities and a flawed implementation and that someone believes that a good Giants list is a positive force for growth of the game. What exactly is hypocritical about discussing it?
Messages In This Thread
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 1:24 a.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 2:10 a.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
garyo -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 2:39 a.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Michael Petch -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 4:03 a.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Leonardo Jerkovic -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 6:15 a.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Florin Popa -- Wednesday, 9 March 2016, at 3:51 p.m.
- Hypocrisy in the backgammon community
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 1:27 a.m.
- Apology
Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 1:43 a.m.
- Apology
Rick Janowski -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 3:52 p.m.
- Apology
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 4:36 p.m.
- Apology
Rick Janowski -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 5:13 p.m.
- Apology
Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 7:47 p.m.
- Apology
Bill Riles -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 8:06 p.m.
- Apology
Leonardo Jerkovic -- Thursday, 10 March 2016, at 8:39 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.