BGonline.org Forums

52S-64H-F-64P-61

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 6:01 a.m.

In Response To: 52S-64H-F-64P-61 (Nack Ballard)

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 147 Unlimited Game Jacoby Beaver pip: 163 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D---cD---c-e--b-AA:0:0:1:61:0:0:3:0:10
52S-64H-F-64P-61

52S-64H-F-64P-61

I played $ (Slot) = bar/24 13/7. Compared to 54S-44P-61, White’s prime is less threatening. Therefore, the need to try to advance the anchor is less. Against 10 checkers in the zone, I chose not to split.

 

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 147 Unlimited Game Jacoby Beaver pip: 162 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-D---cD---c-e--b-B-:0:0:1:15:0:0:3:0:10
62S-41X-43H-61H-51R-65T-55P-51 (a well-played sequence in lieu of 41T-55P-51)

41T-55P-51

As above, the need to advance the anchor is less against a made 3pt than it is against a made 5pt. With 10 checkers in the zone, I want to stand pat in the back court. That leaves a choice between slotting the 5pt or 7pt. I went with the former.

 

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 147 Unlimited Game Jacoby Beaver pip: 167 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-C---cE---c-e--b-B-:0:0:1:65:0:0:3:0:10
62S-41X-43H-61H-51R-51D-55P-65 (a legal, well-played sequence in lieu of 55P-65)

55P-65 (illegal)

With this one, I got bluffed into playing two down, for the same reasons as above. I did not want to split my anchor. Trailing in the race, I thought priming would be a better game plan than running.

Mike

 

Messages In This Thread

• Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
  Timothy Chow -- Friday, 11 April 2014, at 11:34 p.m.
  • Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
    Robert Chow -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 12:35 a.m.
  • Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
    John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 12:55 a.m.
  • Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61) -- spoiler
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 4:47 a.m.
    • Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61) -- spoiler
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 4:15 p.m.
      • 55P-65 and 41T-55P-51
        Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 11:39 p.m.
        • 52S-64H-F-64P-61
          Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 3:55 a.m.
          • 52S-64H-F-64P-61
            Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 6:01 a.m.
        • 41T-55P-51 and 55P-65
          Nack Ballard -- Monday, 14 April 2014, at 4:28 p.m.
    • 64R-32D-F-65P-61, Variant Rollout -- spoiler
      Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 8:16 a.m.
      • 64R-32D-F-65P-61, Variant Rollout -- spoiler
        Igor -- Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 3:27 p.m.
      • 64R-32D-F-65P-61 – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollout
        Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 21 June 2014, at 4:28 a.m.
  • Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
    ah_clem -- Saturday, 12 April 2014, at 8:50 p.m.
  • Rollout: Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 13 April 2014, at 6:26 p.m.
    • Rollout: Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
      Taper_Mike -- Monday, 14 April 2014, at 9:59 a.m.
      • Rollout: Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 14 April 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
        • Rollout: Which bar? #1 (54S-44P-61)
          Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 15 April 2014, at 11:15 a.m.
          • 55P / 44P rule
            Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 15 April 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
            • 55P / 44P rule, update
              Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 22 April 2014, at 4:54 a.m.
    • 54S-44P-61 – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 20 April 2014, at 3:40 a.m.
    • 64P-55P-65 – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 20 April 2014, at 3:53 a.m.