BGonline.org Forums
It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Posted By: Havard Raddum
Date: Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 5:28 p.m.
In Response To: It's time we had our own "Grand Slam" (phil simborg)
I see the discussion of which events that should (not) qualify as a grand slam event has started. To cut that discussion short, what about instead just deciding how many events that should be included as major events. Seems to already be a consensus at 4 - 6 events in order to not dilute the thing. Then one could simply say that the 4-6 largest (however it is defined) events in one given year become major events next year. Just my $0.02.
Messages In This Thread
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
phil simborg -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 11:40 a.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 12:39 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 3:04 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 4:18 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Havard Raddum -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 5:28 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 5:48 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Marc Olsen -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 7:43 p.m.
- +1 *NM*
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 7:58 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Stick -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 8:54 p.m.
- It's time we had our own "Grand Slam"
Art Grater -- Wednesday, 16 April 2014, at 9:29 p.m.
- For now, I think Keene got it right
phil simborg -- Thursday, 17 April 2014, at 12:06 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.