BGonline.org Forums
Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013, at 5:27 a.m.
In Response To: Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame (Matt Cohn-Geier)
In particular before the aphorism that there are only three game plans, a back game may have been considered a viable game plan in itself.
Messages In This Thread
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 5:14 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
David Rennie -- Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 7:23 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Chase -- Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 8:20 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
MishyPoo -- Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 9:32 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Bob Koca -- Sunday, 28 April 2013, at 11:16 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Timothy Chow -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 1:22 a.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
David Rennie -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 5:25 a.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 2:54 p.m.
- Scottish Verdict?
David Rennie -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 4:16 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
ah_clem -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 4:31 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Chuck Bower -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 5:09 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Igor -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 6:30 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 29 April 2013, at 11:45 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 30 April 2013, at 4:39 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Stick -- Tuesday, 30 April 2013, at 10:09 p.m.
- ****Rollout**** 81000 games to get a tie.
David Rennie -- Wednesday, 1 May 2013, at 6:03 a.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame
Stick -- Wednesday, 1 May 2013, at 9:49 p.m.
- Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame --- RO 4-ply
Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 10:12 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.