[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013, at 3:18 p.m.

In Response To: Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame (Daniel Murphy)

O.K., I see the argument, but it does still strike me as odd. For example in a straight non-contact race, I wouldn't say that either player is "defending" against the opponent's strategy. "Defense" to me implies that the opponent is "attacking." "Defend" is narrower than "beat" (or "counter," the term I'd use in preference to your "beat"), just as "attack" is narrower than "beat."

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.