[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013, at 4:39 p.m.

In Response To: Defending vs. a 1/3 backgame (John O'Hagan)

Although generally I would rather not pile up spares on top of the made prime against a backgame, both for flexibility and for chances of completing the prime, here I do not think making our 9 point is important, and I would not want to hit, and not want to expose a blot that could be hit (in order not to have to hit in the near future) -- I want opponent to have to play all numbers. So I'm left with considering 13/8 10/8, 13/6, and 13/11 10/5, and think the last might be best by a little.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.