BGonline.org Forums
Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 6:04 p.m.
In Response To: Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1) (neilkaz)
Suppose the opponent has fast grabbed several times already in the match and is a fast palyer so the time penalty dies not have a real effect. If he gets hit with the stiffer penalty would he finaly stop fast grabbing?
Messages In This Thread
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Justin N. -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 7:22 a.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 1:04 p.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Tom Keith -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 1:11 p.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Bill Riles -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 1:38 p.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
Bob Koca -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 2:37 p.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1)
neilkaz -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 3:48 p.m.
- Common sense asks ...
neilkaz -- Saturday, 5 May 2012, at 6:22 p.m.
- Ruling: Two-fer (Part 1) -- US clock rules
Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 6 May 2012, at 4:22 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.