1. | Rollout1 | 15/11 10/7 | eq: +0.121 |
| Player: Opponent: | 67.03% (G:8.01% B:0.50%) 32.97% (G:10.99% B:4.14%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (+0.115...+0.127) - [100.0%] Duration: 5 minutes 59 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 13/9 10/7 | eq: -0.008 (-0.128) |
| Player: Opponent: | 62.19% (G:6.84% B:0.44%) 37.81% (G:12.57% B:4.73%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (-0.013...-0.002) - [0.0%] Duration: 5 minutes 28 seconds |
|
3. | Rollout1 | 15/12 13/9 | eq: -0.054 (-0.175) |
| Player: Opponent: | 58.73% (G:6.09% B:0.39%) 41.27% (G:11.42% B:3.51%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (-0.059...-0.048) - [0.0%] Duration: 4 minutes 24 seconds |
|
4. | Rollout1 | 15/8 | eq: -0.080 (-0.201) |
| Player: Opponent: | 57.39% (G:6.24% B:0.38%) 42.61% (G:11.39% B:3.38%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (-0.086...-0.074) - [0.0%] Duration: 3 minutes 56 seconds |
|
5. | 2-ply | 15/12 10/6 | eq: -0.202 (-0.323) |
| Player: Opponent: | 54.04% (G:4.48% B:0.04%) 45.96% (G:14.15% B:0.74%) | |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10, MET: Kazaross XG2
Well, it was not a trick question, rather a philosophical one. It's Crawford, G do not count for W. Still slotting 10/7 gives MORE single points. But the cost? Sure- 4 rolls. But B rolled one, gammoned W and won the match. Would you still have played the same (match on the line), if you were not influenced by THE BOTS' ADVICE? This is my question. I'm having second thoughts.