1. | Rollout1 | 15/11 10/7 | eq: -0.503 |
| Player: Opponent: | 64.76% (G:6.32% B:0.44%) 35.24% (G:9.68% B:3.62%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (-0.517...-0.489) - [100.0%] Duration: 5 minutes 19 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 15/12 13/9 | eq: -0.662 (-0.159) |
| Player: Opponent: | 53.93% (G:4.71% B:0.35%) 46.07% (G:8.98% B:1.47%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (-0.675...-0.648) - [0.0%] Duration: 4 minutes 13 seconds |
|
3. | Rollout1 | 15/8 | eq: -0.690 (-0.188) |
| Player: Opponent: | 53.12% (G:4.67% B:0.30%) 46.88% (G:9.14% B:1.63%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (-0.704...-0.676) - [0.0%] Duration: 3 minutes 31 seconds |
|
4. | Rollout1 | 13/9 10/7 | eq: -0.723 (-0.221) |
| Player: Opponent: | 58.86% (G:6.26% B:0.51%) 41.14% (G:10.93% B:3.08%) | Conf.: ± 0.014 (-0.738...-0.709) - [0.0%] Duration: 3 minutes 40 seconds |
|
5. | 2-ply | 15/12 10/6 | eq: -1.085 (-0.583) |
| Player: Opponent: | 54.04% (G:4.48% B:0.04%) 45.96% (G:14.15% B:0.74%) | |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10, MET: Kazaross XG2
Sorry Timothy, wrong envelope. The new parameters do not make a difference for the essence of the argument. Now I know- if given a chance in a similar situation, and recognize it, I'll follow the strategy described in the previous post to Taper Mike). I rebel, period.