[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Director's action? Part B

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, at 1:04 a.m.

In Response To: Director's action? Part B (Tom Keith)

I broke this 'problem' into two parts to take the kibitzer bias out of the equation (for part B). Kibitzers are forbidden from directly interacting with players in all rules sets I'm familiar with. In most rules sets, kibitzers are not banned from mentioning to director a perceived irregularity. Director (with his/her rules-defining omnipotence) can choose to act upon the report or ignore it. I don't see the kibitzer reporting or the director's option as controversial in the least. IMO, the issue (in both parts) is "does director take action or not?" Before I even posted or read replies, I knew that this was controversial.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.