|
BGonline.org Forums
Director's action? Part B
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: Director's action? Part B (Tom Keith)
Date: Wednesday, 26 June 2013, at 1:04 a.m.
I broke this 'problem' into two parts to take the kibitzer bias out of the equation (for part B). Kibitzers are forbidden from directly interacting with players in all rules sets I'm familiar with. In most rules sets, kibitzers are not banned from mentioning to director a perceived irregularity. Director (with his/her rules-defining omnipotence) can choose to act upon the report or ignore it. I don't see the kibitzer reporting or the director's option as controversial in the least. IMO, the issue (in both parts) is "does director take action or not?" Before I even posted or read replies, I knew that this was controversial.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.