I have decided I don't like playing legal moves and here's why…
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: I have decided I don't like playing legal moves and here's why… (christian munk-christensen)
Date: Monday, 2 September 2013, at 3:00 p.m.
In Response To: I have decided I don't like playing legal moves and here's why… (christian munk-christensen)
So the guy who has done nothing wrong ends up looking like a cheater.
By the same token, if someone makes an illegal move (regardless of which rule is in force) s/he also looks like a cheater?
You can split hairs and say "someone who makes an illegal move HAS done something wrong" but then so has someone who fails to notice the opponent's illegal move. The "act of omission vs. act of commission" is really an argument merely for the sake of argument.
If some kibitzer is so narrow-minded that s/he thinks my missing an illegal move (when playing legal moves) is an attempt to cheat, then why should I give a rat's ass? Do you really need to be held in high esteem by everyone, including the dolts?
Messages In This Thread
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.