[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Giants are the top 32

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Tuesday, 17 December 2013, at 9:24 p.m.

In Response To: World-Class Players Not On Stick's List (Paul Weaver)

Despite the obvious flaws in the process, I think the top 32 are generally all exceptionally strong players who belong on an elite list. It really works rather well. I totally agree that it doesn't work as well for 33 - 64. Rather than change the process, I would like to see 33 - 64 deemphasized. It is fine to show the list somewhere. It increases interest in voting. But, Giants have always been the top 32. Show 33 - 64 on a different page or something. I hear a lot of people describing 33 - 64 as Giants and this just isn't the original use of the term. If we could stick to the top 32 on the list when we talk about Giants, there wouldn't be as much concern with how accurate the rest of the list was.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.